Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 29, 2025

Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04370
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Perez Perez v. New York State Driving Improvement Unit: Judge Swain ordered payment or an IFP application before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Victor Manuel Perez Perez and the pending action against the New York State Driving Improvement Unit.

What happened

Victor Manuel Perez Perez sued the New York State Driving Improvement Unit. The opinion does not address the substance of his claims.

Perez Perez filed the complaint without paying the required fees and without submitting an application to proceed without prepaying them. The court gave him 30 days to pay $405 or submit a signed application for that status. No summons would issue at that time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the case would be processed if Perez Perez complied, but that the action would be dismissed if he did not. She also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit · No. 1:25-cv-04370
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 29, 2025

Nature of the Order

This was an order about the filing fee and the plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepaying court fees. It did not decide the underlying claims.

Background

Victor Manuel Perez Perez brought the action pro se, meaning without a lawyer. He submitted a complaint but did not pay the required fees or provide an application to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without prepayment of fees.

Court’s Order

The court stated that a civil action requires either payment of $405—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. Within 30 days of the order, Perez Perez had to pay the $405 or submit the attached application, labeled with docket number 25-CV-4370 (LTS). If the court granted the application, he would be allowed to proceed without prepaying fees.

No summons would issue at that time. If Perez Perez complied with the order, the Clerk’s Office would process the case under its procedures. If he failed to comply within the permitted time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal-Related Ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status for purposes of an appeal.

Disposition

The court directed Perez Perez to pay the fees or submit an application to proceed without prepaying them. The order did not resolve the merits of the lawsuit.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.