Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-04370
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
Perez Perez v. New York State Driving Improvement Unit: Judge Swain ordered payment or an IFP application before the case could proceed.
Victor Manuel Perez Perez and the pending action against the New York State Driving Improvement Unit.
What happened
Victor Manuel Perez Perez sued the New York State Driving Improvement Unit. The opinion does not address the substance of his claims.
Perez Perez filed the complaint without paying the required fees and without submitting an application to proceed without prepaying them. The court gave him 30 days to pay $405 or submit a signed application for that status. No summons would issue at that time.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the case would be processed if Perez Perez complied, but that the action would be dismissed if he did not. She also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.
The detailed version
- Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit · No. 1:25-cv-04370
- Laura Swain
- May 29, 2025
Nature of the Order
This was an order about the filing fee and the plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepaying court fees. It did not decide the underlying claims.
Background
Victor Manuel Perez Perez brought the action pro se, meaning without a lawyer. He submitted a complaint but did not pay the required fees or provide an application to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without prepayment of fees.
Court’s Order
The court stated that a civil action requires either payment of $405—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. Within 30 days of the order, Perez Perez had to pay the $405 or submit the attached application, labeled with docket number 25-CV-4370 (LTS). If the court granted the application, he would be allowed to proceed without prepaying fees.
No summons would issue at that time. If Perez Perez complied with the order, the Clerk’s Office would process the case under its procedures. If he failed to comply within the permitted time, the action would be dismissed.
Appeal-Related Ruling
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status for purposes of an appeal.
Disposition
The court directed Perez Perez to pay the fees or submit an application to proceed without prepaying them. The order did not resolve the merits of the lawsuit.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.