Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled May 30, 2025

Olderman v. John McDonald & Sons, Inc.

Judge
Laura Provinzino
Docket
0:25-cv-01050
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Olderman v. John McDonald & Sons, Inc., Judge Provinzino remanded the action to Minnesota state court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Jeanne Olderman and the defendants are affected because the action was remanded from federal court to the District Court of the State of Minnesota, Ninth Judicial District, County of Beltrami.

What happened

Olderman v. John McDonald & Sons, Inc. was pending in federal court in Minnesota. A magistrate judge recommended sending the case back to Minnesota state court because the federal court lacked authority to hear it.

No party objected to the recommendation. The court therefore reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake, and found none.

Judge Laura M. Provinzino adopted the recommendation in full and remanded the action to the District Court of the State of Minnesota, Ninth Judicial District, County of Beltrami.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Olderman v. John McDonald & Sons, Inc. · No. 0:25-cv-01050
Judge
Laura M. Provinzino
Date
May 30, 2025

Background

Jeanne Olderman brought this action against John McDonald & Sons, Inc., John Doe, Richard Doe, XYZ Entity, and Dave Levy Construction, LLC. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Report and Recommendation

United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a May 14, 2025 Report and Recommendation recommending that the action be remanded to Minnesota state court because the federal court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, meaning it lacked legal authority to hear the case. No party objected.

Ruling

Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error. Finding no clear error, Judge Laura M. Provinzino adopted the Report and Recommendation in full. The court remanded the action to the District Court of the State of Minnesota, Ninth Judicial District, County of Beltrami, and ordered that judgment be entered accordingly.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.