Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 4, 2025

Miller v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-06532
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Miller v. United States, Judge Swain dismissed Maureen Miller’s action and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

Maureen Miller’s action against the United States was dismissed; the judgment also included a certification concerning any appeal.

What happened

In Miller v. United States, the court entered a civil judgment dismissing Maureen Miller’s action against the United States.

The judgment says the dismissal was for the reasons given in a June 3, 2025, order, but that order is not included here. The judgment therefore does not explain the legal basis for dismissal or state whether the dismissal permits refiling.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith, citing a federal statute and a Supreme Court decision.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Miller v. United States · No. 1:24-cv-06532
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 4, 2025

Disposition

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing Maureen Miller’s action against the United States. The judgment states that the dismissal was based on the reasons in the court’s June 3, 2025, order. That earlier order is not provided in the opinion text, so the basis for dismissal cannot be determined from this judgment alone. The judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

Appeal certification

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962), for that certification.

Result

The action was dismissed. No separate ruling on claims, defenses, or the merits is stated in the provided text.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.