Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 4, 2025

Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04606
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit was dismissed, and Judge Swain certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

The action brought by Victor Manuel Perez Perez against the New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit was dismissed. The judgment also affects any potential appeal by certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

What happened

In Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit, Victor Manuel Perez Perez sued the New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit. The judgment does not explain the claims or the reason for dismissal.

The judgment says the action was dismissed for the reasons stated in a June 3, 2025 order, but that order is not included here. The available text therefore does not show what issue the court decided.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the civil judgment on June 4, 2025, dismissing the action. She also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit · No. 1:25-cv-04606
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 4, 2025

Disposition

The court dismissed the action. The judgment states that the dismissal was for the reasons given in a June 3, 2025 order, but that order is not part of the provided opinion text. The available judgment therefore does not identify the claims, the parties’ arguments, or the court’s reason for dismissing the action.

Appeal Certification

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962).

Effect

The action was dismissed. The provided text does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice, and it does not provide the basis for the dismissal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.