Sreedhar v. Canadian Consulate General
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-04476
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Sreedhar v. Canadian Consulate General, Judge Swain granted withdrawal, dismissed the action without prejudice, and denied other pending requests without prejudice.
Srikant(h) Sreedhar and defendants Canadian Consulate General, Parsons Corporation, and Tom Clark; the action was dismissed without prejudice, other pending requests were denied without prejudice, and appeal-related fee-waiver status was denied.
What happened
In Sreedhar v. Canadian Consulate General, Srikant(h) Sreedhar asked to withdraw the action on May 30, 2025. The defendants were Canadian Consulate General, Parsons Corporation, and Tom Clark.
The court granted the withdrawal request and dismissed the action without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. That means the dismissal did not bar refiling. The court also denied any other pending motion or request without prejudice.
Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying court fees. The order was dated June 2, 2025.
The detailed version
- Sreedhar v. Canadian Consulate General · No. 1:25-cv-04476
- Laura Swain
- June 2, 2025
Background
Srikant(h) Sreedhar sued Canadian Consulate General, Parsons Corporation, and Tom Clark. On May 30, 2025, Sreedhar filed a motion asking to withdraw the action.
Ruling
Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain granted the motion. The court dismissed the action without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A dismissal without prejudice does not bar the plaintiff from refiling the action. The court also denied without prejudice any other pending motion or request in the action.
Appeal and filing fees
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status for an appeal, meaning Sreedhar could not appeal under that fee-waiver status based on this order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.