Brown v. Doe
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-04523
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Brown v. Doe, Judge Swain ordered Marvin Brown to pay filing fees or submit prisoner forms within 30 days.
Marvin Brown, who must either pay the required fees or submit the specified prisoner forms within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.
What happened
In Brown v. Doe, Marvin Brown filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying them. The order states that Brown is detained and representing himself.
The court gave Brown 30 days to either pay $405 in fees or submit the required application and authorization allowing installment payments from his account. No summons would issue at that time.
Judge Swain warned that the action would be dismissed if Brown did not comply, and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Brown v. Doe · No. 1:25-cv-04523
- Laura Swain
- June 5, 2025
Background
Marvin Brown filed this civil action without paying the required filing and administrative fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization. The order states that Brown is detained at the West Facility Annex on Rikers Island and is representing himself.
Payment and application requirements
The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $405 in fees—$350 for filing and $55 in administrative fees—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. If the court approves that application, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the detention facility to deduct those payments and provide certified account statements for the previous six months.
The court gave Brown 30 days from the date of the order to pay the $405 or submit the required forms, labeled with docket number 25-CV-4523 (LTS). No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that the action would be dismissed if Brown failed to comply within the allowed period.
Other ruling
The court certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the merits of Brown’s claims or issue a final dismissal of the action.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.