Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled June 9, 2025

Engels v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:25-cv-02176
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Engels v. Commissioner, Judge Andrew Carter reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the case for further administrative proceedings.

Who this affects

Ginamarie Engels and the Commissioner of Social Security; the case returns to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.

What happened

In Engels v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court entered judgment concerning the Commissioner’s decision in Ginamarie Engels’s case.

The judgment states that the court’s reasons were provided in a June 6, 2025, stipulation and order, which is not included in the opinion text provided here.

Judge Andrew Carter reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the action to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Engels v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:25-cv-02176
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
June 9, 2025

Background

The provided document is a judgment in Ginamarie Engels’s case against the Commissioner of Social Security. It states that the reasons for the judgment appear in a stipulation and order dated June 6, 2025, but that document and any explanation of the underlying dispute are not included in the provided text.

Ruling

The court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the action to the Commissioner under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. A remand sends the matter back to the agency for additional proceedings. The judgment cites Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.