Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 10, 2025

Williams v. The City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-02855
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Williams v. City of New York: Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

The judgment dismissed Rahjeem Williams’s action against The City of New York and the other named defendants, and denied Williams permission to appeal without paying court fees.

What happened

In Williams v. The City of New York, Rahjeem Williams’s action against the City and other defendants was dismissed. The judgment does not explain the underlying reasons; it refers to a June 9, 2025, order that is not included here.

The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Williams permission to appeal without paying court fees.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment on June 10, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. The City of New York · No. 1:25-cv-02855
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 10, 2025

Disposition

The court dismissed the action “[f]or the reasons stated in the June 9, 2025, order.” That earlier order is not included in the provided opinion, so the basis for dismissal and whether the court reached the merits cannot be determined from this text.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Williams permission to proceed without paying court fees for purposes of an appeal. The judgment cites a Supreme Court decision explaining that good faith exists when an appellant seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue.

Judge and date

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment, which was dated June 10, 2025, in New York, New York.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.