Jiang v. New York Police Department
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-03517
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In re Ziyao Jiang: Judge Swain barred Jiang from future fee-free civil filings here without permission and ordered judgments dismissing 16 cases.
Ziyao Jiang is subject to a filing bar in the Southern District of New York: future civil actions without filing fees require prior court permission, and the 16 listed cases were ordered dismissed by civil judgment.
What happened
In re Ziyao Jiang concerns 16 civil cases that Ziyao Jiang filed without a lawyer and without paying filing fees. The court had already dismissed those cases for failing to state a claim and for being frivolous, and it asked Jiang why it should not restrict future filings.
Jiang submitted a declaration and other responses, but the court found that they did not provide a sufficient reason to avoid the restriction. The court therefore barred Jiang from filing future civil cases without paying filing fees in this court unless he first obtains permission and submits the proposed complaint and the bar order with his permission request.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain made the bar effective May 9, 2025, directed the clerk to terminate pending motions and enter civil judgments dismissing the 16 cases, and denied fee-free status for any appeal from the order.
The detailed version
- Jiang v. New York Police Department · No. 1:25-cv-03517
- Laura Swain
- June 9, 2025
Background
Ziyao Jiang filed 16 civil actions in the Southern District of New York between April 27 and May 9, 2025. The court had allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees in each case. On May 9, 2025, the court dismissed the actions for failure to state a claim and as frivolous. It also noted that Jiang had previously filed more than 65 cases in the Eastern District of New York and had been warned there that continued frivolous and abusive filings could lead to a filing injunction.
The court denied Jiang permission to amend his pleadings because it found amendment would be futile. It then ordered him to explain why he should not be barred from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees unless he first received the court's permission. Jiang filed a declaration and multiple responses in the affected cases. The court reviewed those submissions and found that, although they referred to different details, their assertions were substantially similar and did not explain why the filing restriction should not be imposed.
Ruling
The court issued the filing bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Effective May 9, 2025, Jiang is barred from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees in this court unless he first obtains leave from the court. Any request for permission must be filed with the Pro Se Intake Unit and must include the proposed complaint and a copy of the bar order. The court stated that an action filed without following this procedure will be dismissed for failure to comply with the order.
The court also warned that continued frivolous submissions could result in additional sanctions, including monetary penalties. It directed the clerk to terminate all pending motions and enter civil judgments dismissing the 16 listed cases. Finally, the court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Jiang permission to appeal without paying filing fees. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.