Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled June 12, 2025

In Re: Wythe Berry Fee Owner LLC

Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Docket
1:24-cv-06499
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
BankruptcyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In In re Wythe Berry Fee Owner LLC, Judge Hellerstein affirmed allowing compliance with a restraining notice against money owed to Yoel Goldman.

Who this affects

The ruling directly affected Yoel Goldman, Meyer Chetrit, and Wythe Berry Fee Owner LLC. It allowed Wythe Berry to comply with Chetrit's restraining notice concerning the $650,000 distribution owed to Goldman.

What happened

In In re Wythe Berry Fee Owner LLC, Yoel Goldman appealed a bankruptcy court order involving money the debtor was required to distribute to him. The bankruptcy court had allowed Wythe Berry Fee Owner LLC to comply with a restraining notice issued by Meyer Chetrit.

Wythe Berry was required to distribute $650,000 to Goldman under an approved reorganization plan and settlement agreement. Chetrit had an unsatisfied $8,500,950 judgment against Goldman and served Wythe Berry with a notice seeking to prevent it from paying Goldman.

The district court ruled that the restraining notice did not violate the bankruptcy case’s automatic stay and affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order. Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein directed the Clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In Re: Wythe Berry Fee Owner LLC · No. 1:24-cv-06499
Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Date
June 12, 2025

Background

Yoel Goldman appealed an August 1, 2024 order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. That order authorized Wythe Berry Fee Owner LLC, the debtor, to comply with a restraining notice issued by Meyer Chetrit.

Goldman and a business partner formed Wythe Berry to finance construction of a luxury hotel. An involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy case began on October 6, 2022. Under Wythe Berry’s Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization and the Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement, which the bankruptcy court approved on May 29, 2024, Wythe Berry was required to distribute $650,000 each to Goldman and his business partner.

Chetrit served Wythe Berry with a restraining notice on June 4, 2024. The notice sought to prevent Wythe Berry from paying Goldman because Chetrit held a final, unsatisfied state-court judgment against Goldman. The judgment was entered on January 29, 2021, in the amount of $8,500,950.

Bankruptcy Court Ruling and Appeal

After a hearing and briefing, the bankruptcy court found that the restraining notice did not violate the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362. An automatic stay generally pauses certain collection and other actions against a bankruptcy debtor or bankruptcy estate while the case is pending. Goldman appealed that ruling. The district court stated that it reviewed the bankruptcy court’s legal conclusions independently and that there were no factual issues.

District Court’s Decision

The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s decision authorizing Wythe Berry to comply with the restraining notice. It relied on 28 U.S.C. § 959(b), which requires a debtor to operate according to valid state laws, and New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 5222, which permits a judgment creditor to issue a restraining notice preventing a third party from satisfying a debt owed to a judgment debtor.

The court noted that Chetrit’s judgment against Goldman was final and predated the bankruptcy case. It also noted that Wythe Berry did not object to the restraining notice and that carrying it out would not interfere with Wythe Berry’s reorganization efforts or the fairness and efficiency of distribution. Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order and directed the Clerk to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.