Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2025

Mitchells v. New York City

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04743
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mitchells v. New York City, Judge Swain ordered Johnathan Mitchells to pay filing fees or submit a complete, signed fee-waiver application within 30 days.

Who this affects

Johnathan Mitchells, a detained pro se prisoner whose civil action could be dismissed if he does not pay the required fees or submit a complete, signed amended IFP application within 30 days.

What happened

Johnathan Mitchells sued New York City and New York State while detained at the George R. Vierno Center on Rikers Island. He filed the complaint without a complete application to proceed without paying the fees upfront.

The court said Mitchells must either pay $405 or submit an amended fee-waiver application within 30 days. His application was missing its second page and was unsigned, although he had submitted a prisoner authorization.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that no summons issue yet and said the case would proceed through the Clerk’s Office if Mitchells complied. If he did not comply on time, the action would be dismissed; the court also denied fee-waiver status for an appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mitchells v. New York City · No. 1:25-cv-04743
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 16, 2025

Background

Johnathan Mitchells brought this action pro se, meaning without a lawyer, while detained at the George R. Vierno Center on Rikers Island. He submitted a complaint, a prisoner authorization, and an incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), meaning without prepaying court fees. The IFP application was missing its second page and was unsigned.

The fee requirement

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submit a signed IFP application and a prisoner authorization. If IFP status is granted, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization allows the facility to deduct those payments and requires certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the previous six months. The $55 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted IFP status.

Order

The court ordered Mitchells, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $405 in fees or submit the attached amended IFP application, labeled with docket number 25-CV-4743 (LTS). No summons would issue at that time. If he complied, the Clerk’s Office would process the case under its procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order cautioned that certain future dismissals of prisoner cases can count as “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), potentially limiting a prisoner’s ability to file future federal civil actions without prepaying fees unless the prisoner faces imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.