Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 17, 2025

Phillips v. Williams

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05027
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Phillips v. Williams, Judge Swain ordered Tyler R. Phillips to pay fees or correct his fee-waiver application and provide original signatures.

Who this affects

Tyler R. Phillips, whose case cannot proceed unless he timely submits the required fee information and original signatures.

What happened

Phillips v. Williams concerns Tyler R. Phillips’s attempt to start a civil case without paying the required filing fees. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees, but the court found that his answers did not establish that he could not pay.

The court also found that the complaint, fee-waiver application, and consent to electronic service did not contain original signatures. Phillips must submit a signed amended application and original signatures on the complaint and consent form within 30 days of the order.

Judge Swain directed Phillips to meet these requirements before the case can be processed and said no summons would issue for now. The court stated that the action will be dismissed if he does not comply, and denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Phillips v. Williams · No. 1:25-cv-05027
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 17, 2025

Background

Tyler R. Phillips brought this civil action without a lawyer. To proceed in the Southern District of New York, he had to either pay $405 in filing and administrative fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying those fees, commonly called an IFP application.

Phillips submitted an IFP application, but the court found that it did not provide enough information to determine whether he was unable to pay. The application stated that he was employed and earned $750 per month and that he supported his daughter, but he did not answer whether he had other sources of income. When asked how he paid his expenses, he wrote, “With my jon.”

Signature requirement

The court also found that the complaint, IFP application, and consent to electronic service did not contain original signatures. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the court’s local rules, an unrepresented party must personally sign pleadings and other papers. The court explained that this requires a handwritten signature or a mark placed by the party.

Order

The court directed Phillips to submit, within 30 days of the order, an amended IFP application with a signature and original signatures on the complaint and consent to electronic service. The court stated that no summons would issue at that time. If Phillips complies, the Clerk’s Office will process the case under its procedures; if he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied authorization to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued and signed the order on June 17, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.