Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 11, 2025

Williams v. Combs

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04598
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Williams v. Combs, Judge Swain transferred the action to the Eastern District of New York because Brooklyn was the more convenient forum.

Who this affects

The action brought by Rose Williams, with Zamiyah Dukes and Devian Young listed as plaintiffs, against Sean Combs, Cassie Ventura, Jacqueline Deane, Officer Sauter, Robin Korasyk, the Kings County Family Court, and Akram Louis was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The transferee court will decide whether Williams may proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Williams v. Combs, Rose Williams filed a self-represented action against Sean Combs, Cassie Ventura, Jacqueline Deane, Officer Sauter, Robin Korasyk, the Kings County Family Court, and Akram Louis. The complaint invoked diversity jurisdiction and appeared mainly to concern events at the Kings County Family Court in Brooklyn.

The Southern District of New York explained that the complaint did not identify events occurring in that district. Because the events, likely witnesses, and relevant documents appeared to be centered in Brooklyn, the court found that the Eastern District of New York was a more convenient forum and transferred the action there.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the transfer and closed the Southern District case. The Eastern District must decide whether Williams may continue without paying filing fees, and the Southern District denied self-represented appeal-fee status for any appeal from the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. Combs · No. 1:25-cv-04598
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 11, 2025

Background

Rose Williams brought this self-represented action under the court’s diversity jurisdiction. The caption listed Rose Williams, Zamiyah Dukes, and Devian Young as plaintiffs, but the opinion states that Williams was the only plaintiff who signed the complaint and the application to proceed without prepaying fees. The named defendants were Sean Combs, Cassie Ventura, the Kings County Family Court, Jacqueline Deane, Officer Sauter, Robin Korasyk, and Akram Louis.

The complaint was described as confusing. The court said that the central allegations appeared to concern events at the Kings County Family Court in Brooklyn, while also including apparently unrelated allegations that Combs chased Williams across the country. Williams alleged that Combs was detained at the Metropolitan Detention Complex in Brooklyn, gave the court a Manhattan address for Ventura, and alleged that the other defendants were employed at the Kings County Family Court.

Venue and Transfer

Federal law permits a civil action to be filed in certain districts, including where a substantial part of the events occurred. The court explained that Kings County is in the Eastern District of New York and that nothing in the complaint suggested that events giving rise to the claims occurred in the Southern District of New York. Because the residences of most defendants were unknown, the court said it was unclear whether venue was proper in either district based on defendants’ residences. Even assuming venue was proper in the Southern District, the court concluded that venue was also proper in the Eastern District because the underlying events occurred there.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), a court may transfer a case to another district where it could have been brought when the transfer would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and the interests of justice. The court found transfer appropriate because a substantial part of the events occurred in Brooklyn, where Williams resides and most defendants were employed or incarcerated. It also found that most relevant documents and witnesses could reasonably be expected to be in Brooklyn.

Disposition

The court ordered the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. It stated that the transferee court would decide whether Williams should be allowed to proceed without prepaying fees. The Southern District court directed that no summons issue from that court and stated that the order closed the case there. It also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.