Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 18, 2025

Okafor v. HEI HOTELS

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05038
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Okafor v. HEI HOTELS, Judge Swain ordered payment or an application to proceed without fees within 30 days, or the action will be dismissed.

Who this affects

Chisom Okafor, who must pay the required fees or submit a signed IFP application within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Okafor v. HEI HOTELS, Chisom Okafor filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting an application to proceed without paying them upfront. The opinion does not address the underlying claims.

The court gave Okafor 30 days from June 18, 2025, to pay $405 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. No summons will issue yet. If Okafor does not comply, the action will be dismissed.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Okafor v. HEI HOTELS · No. 1:25-cv-05038
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 18, 2025

Background

Chisom Okafor filed this civil action pro se, meaning without a lawyer. Okafor submitted the complaint without paying the required filing fees and without submitting an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which means proceeding without prepaying court fees.

Order

The court explained that the required fees total $405: a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee. Within 30 days of the order, Okafor must either pay the $405 or submit a signed IFP application labeled with docket number 1:25-CV-5038 (LTS). If the court grants the IFP application, Okafor may proceed without prepaying the fees.

No summons will issue at this time. The case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Okafor complies. If Okafor does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.

Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered an order directing Okafor either to pay the fees or submit an IFP application. The opinion did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.