Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 17, 2025

Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04975
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit, Judge Swain dismissed the duplicate complaint without prejudice to Perez Perez’s pending case.

Who this affects

Victor Manuel Perez Perez’s duplicate federal complaint was dismissed, while his earlier case under docket number 25-CV-4370 (LTS) remained pending according to the opinion.

What happened

Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit involved a complaint that repeated an identical case Perez Perez had already filed against the same defendant. The earlier case remained pending under docket number 25-CV-4370 (LTS).

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez Perez v. New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit · No. 1:25-cv-04975
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 17, 2025

Background

Victor Manuel Perez Perez, who was representing himself, filed this action against the New York State DMV Driving Improvement Unit. The court stated that Perez Perez had already submitted an identical complaint against the same defendant in a case still pending under docket number 25-CV-4370 (LTS). The court also noted that this was the second duplicate action filed in this court.

A footnote stated that, in the pending case, the court had directed Perez Perez to either pay the required $405 filing fee or submit an application to proceed without paying the fee. He had not responded to that direction, paid the fee, or submitted an application with this complaint.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint as duplicative and stated that the dismissal was without prejudice to Perez Perez’s pending case. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment in this action. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the required fees. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.