Angelino v. NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
- Laura Swain
- 1:24-cv-07907
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Angelino v. NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Judge Swain dismissed the action and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The action brought by Eli Angelino against the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene was dismissed.
What happened
Angelino v. NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene was an action brought by Eli Angelino against the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The judgment does not describe the claims or the underlying dispute.
The court dismissed the action for the reasons stated in a June 20, 2025, order, which is not included in the opinion text provided. The court also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment on June 24, 2025. The judgment does not state whether the dismissal was based on the merits or on a procedural issue.
The detailed version
- Angelino v. NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene · No. 1:24-cv-07907
- Laura Swain
- June 24, 2025
Background
The provided judgment identifies Eli Angelino as the plaintiff and the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene as the defendant. It does not describe the claims, facts, or legal arguments. It refers to a June 20, 2025, order for the reasons supporting dismissal, but that order is not included here.
Ruling
The court dismissed the action. The judgment does not add a “with prejudice” or “without prejudice” qualification. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. That certification concerns eligibility to pursue an appeal without paying the required filing fees; the provided text does not explain the basis for the certification.
Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on June 24, 2025, in New York, New York.
Limits of the Provided Opinion
Because the June 20 order is not provided, this judgment alone does not show whether the dismissal resolved the merits of Angelino’s claims or rested on a procedural or other ground.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.