Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 26, 2025

Donnay v. Del Grasso

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05260
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Donnay v. Del Grasso, Chief Judge Swain ordered the plaintiff to pay fees or submit the required prisoner authorization.

Who this affects

Dominique Francis Donnay, Sr.; the case will proceed only if he pays the required fees or submits the required prisoner authorization within 30 days.

What happened

In Donnay v. Del Grasso, Dominique Francis Donnay, Sr., who is detained at Westchester County Jail and representing himself, submitted an application to proceed without paying court fees upfront. He did not submit the required authorization allowing installment payments from his prisoner account.

The court gave Donnay 30 days to either pay $405 in fees or complete and submit the prisoner authorization. The court said no summons would issue yet and that the case would be processed if he complied. If he did not comply on time, the action would be dismissed.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also stated that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the claims in the lawsuit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Donnay v. Del Grasso · No. 1:25-cv-05260
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 26, 2025

Background

Dominique Francis Donnay, Sr., who is detained at Westchester County Jail, filed this civil action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees, but he did not submit the separate prisoner authorization required for a prisoner seeking that status.

The court explained that filing a civil action ordinarily requires $405 in fees: a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee. If a prisoner is allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization directs the detention facility to make those deductions and to provide the court with certified account statements for the previous six months. The $55 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court ordered Donnay, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $405 in fees or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 25-CV-5260 (LTS). No summons would issue at that time. If Donnay complied, the Clerk’s Office would process the case under its procedures; if he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Other ruling

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the merits of Donnay’s underlying claims. It also warned about the possible consequences of future dismissals that qualify as “strikes” under the federal prisoner-litigation statute, including limits on proceeding without prepaying fees after three such strikes unless the prisoner faces imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.