Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 1, 2025

Friedeberg v. Moen Corp.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04051
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Friedeberg v. Moen Corp., Judge Swain dismissed the action and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

The action brought by Donna L. Friedeberg against Moen Corp. and Delta Faucet Company was dismissed.

What happened

Donna L. Friedeberg brought this action against Moen Corp. and Delta Faucet Company. The judgment does not explain the claims or the dispute's underlying facts.

The court said the action was dismissed for the reasons stated in a June 30, 2025, order, which is not included in the provided text. The judgment therefore does not reveal the dismissal's specific basis.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the civil judgment on July 1, 2025, and certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Friedeberg v. Moen Corp. · No. 1:25-cv-04051
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 1, 2025

Background

Donna L. Friedeberg sued Moen Corp. and Delta Faucet Company. The provided civil judgment does not describe the claims, the parties' arguments, or the underlying facts.

Ruling

The court stated: “For the reasons stated in the June 30, 2025, order, this action is dismissed.” The June 30 order is not included, so the judgment itself does not identify the legal or factual basis for dismissal. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. This certification concerns the court's view of the appeal and does not provide the missing reason for dismissing the action.

Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the civil judgment dismissing the action on July 1, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.