Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 11, 2025

Hodge v. Rykers Islands

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-05737
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hodge v. City of New York D.O.C., Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

Who this affects

The judgment dismissed Shakeem Hodge’s action against City of New York D.O.C. and Reed Shield #1373 and denied Hodge in forma pauperis status for an appeal.

What happened

In Shakeem Hodge v. City of New York D.O.C. and Reed Shield #1373, the court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action. The judgment refers to reasons stated in a July 11, 2025, order, but that order is not included here.

The court also determined that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Hodge permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The judgment does not state why the action was dismissed.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on July 11, 2025, in New York, New York.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hodge v. Rykers Islands · No. 1:24-cv-05737
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 11, 2025

Disposition

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action “for the reasons stated” in a July 11, 2025, order. That referenced order is not included in the provided text, so the basis for dismissal cannot be determined from this judgment alone.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status for an appeal, meaning permission to pursue the appeal without paying the required filing fees in advance. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States for this determination.

Judge and Date

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment, which was dated July 11, 2025, in New York, New York.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.