Isaacs v. Imperati
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-03964
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Isaacs v. Imperati, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied appeal-related in forma pauperis status.
Stephen Isaacs's action was dismissed, and his ability to appeal without paying filing fees was denied. The provided text does not explain the dismissal's underlying basis.
What happened
Isaacs v. Imperati is an action brought by Stephen Isaacs against Sheriff Kirk Imperati and Commissioner Daniel Martuscello.
The judgment says the action was dismissed for the reasons given in a July 15, 2025 order, but that earlier order is not included here. The court also determined that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action and denied Isaacs permission to appeal without paying the filing fees. The judgment does not state the basis for dismissing the action.
The detailed version
- Isaacs v. Imperati · No. 1:25-cv-03964
- Laura Swain
- July 15, 2025
Disposition
The court dismissed the action “for the reasons stated” in a July 15, 2025 order. The provided opinion text does not include that order, so it does not explain why the action was dismissed.
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees. The judgment does not state that the dismissal was with or without prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.