JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Nowak
- James Oetken
- 1:23-cv-06834
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Nowak, Judge Oetken granted JPMorgan’s summary-judgment motion, denied amended-counterclaim filing, and closed the case.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Martin Piotr Nowak, the other defendants, and any party seeking to appeal without paying the filing fee.
What happened
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. sued Martin Piotr Nowak and other defendants in the Southern District of New York. The provided judgment does not describe the underlying claims or dispute.
JPMorgan moved for summary judgment. A defendant moved for permission to file amended counterclaims.
The court granted JPMorgan’s motion for summary judgment, denied the motion to file amended counterclaims, and entered judgment for JPMorgan, closing the case. Judge James Oetken also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying the filing fee for an appeal.
The detailed version
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Nowak · No. 1:23-cv-06834
- James Oetken
- July 16, 2025
Rulings
The judgment states that, for the reasons in the court’s July 15, 2025 Opinion and Order:
- Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s motion for summary judgment was granted. - A defendant’s motion for leave to file amended counterclaims was denied. - Judgment was entered in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. - The case was closed.
Appeal and filing-fee ruling
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying the filing fee for an appeal.
Scope of the provided text
This text is the judgment and refers to a separate July 15 Opinion and Order. It does not explain the underlying claims, the reasons for granting summary judgment, or the proposed amended counterclaims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.