Murray v. Fox
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-05604
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Murray v. Fox was dismissed, and Judge Swain certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The dismissal affects Daniel S. Murray’s action against Sergeant Fox and the other named defendants. The judgment also concerns any appeal from the judgment.
What happened
In Murray v. Fox, the court dismissed Daniel S. Murray’s action against Sergeant Fox and the other defendants. The judgment gives no further explanation and refers to a July 11, 2025, order.
The court also certified under federal law that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The provided judgment does not explain the basis for that certification.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the civil judgment on July 16, 2025. The July 11 order is not included, so the reason for dismissal cannot be determined from this text.
The detailed version
- Murray v. Fox · No. 1:25-cv-05604
- Laura Swain
- July 16, 2025
Disposition
The court dismissed the action for the reasons stated in its July 11, 2025, order. That earlier order is not included in the provided text, so this judgment does not identify the claims, the legal basis for dismissal, or whether the court reached the merits.
The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States for that certification.
Effect
The action was dismissed. The provided text does not state additional terms governing the dismissal or explain the consequences of the appeal certification.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.