Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 16, 2025

Mallgren v. United Nations

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05674
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mallgren v. United Nations, Judge Swain dismissed the action and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against the United Nations was dismissed; the judgment also included a certification concerning any appeal.

What happened

In Mallgren v. United Nations, the court dismissed Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against the United Nations. The judgment says the reasons were stated in a July 10, 2025, order, which is not included here.

The court certified under federal law that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment does not state the underlying basis for dismissal or add a prejudice qualification.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the civil judgment on July 16, 2025, and ordered that the action be dismissed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. United Nations · No. 1:25-cv-05674
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 16, 2025

Disposition

The court dismissed the action for the reasons stated in its July 10, 2025, order. That earlier order is not included in the provided text, so the basis for dismissal cannot be determined from this judgment alone. The judgment does not say that the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

Appeal certification

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962).

Judge and date

Judge Laura Taylor Swain, Chief United States District Judge, signed and entered the civil judgment on July 16, 2025, in New York, New York.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.