Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 16, 2025

Aziz v. Butt

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
7:25-cv-05789
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Aziz v. Butt, Judge Swain ordered payment or a fee-waiver application within 30 days before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Javaid Aziz, individually and as attorney-in-fact for Jamila K. Butt; the case cannot proceed until the required payment or a completed and signed fee-waiver application is received.

What happened

Javaid Aziz submitted this civil action by email, listing himself individually and as attorney-in-fact for Jamila K. Butt. The court assigned the case a docket number but did not address the underlying claims.

The court ordered Aziz to pay $405 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without paying the fees in advance within 30 days. The court stated that no further action would occur, and no summons or answer would be required, until it received payment or a completed application.

If Aziz did not comply or request more time, the court said the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Aziz v. Butt · No. 7:25-cv-05789
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 16, 2025

Background

Javaid Aziz submitted the action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by email. The caption identifies him as acting individually and as attorney-in-fact for Jamila K. Butt. The action names Neelofar K. Butt and other defendants, but this order does not describe the underlying claims.

Payment or fee-waiver application

The court explained that a civil plaintiff must either pay the required fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying them. The required payment was $405, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee. Within 30 days, Aziz had to pay the fees or submit a completed and signed application to proceed without prepayment of fees, commonly called an IFP application.

The order specified payment procedures, including acceptable payment methods and the requirement that mailed payment include the docket number. If more than one plaintiff sought to proceed without prepaying fees, each plaintiff would have to submit a separate signed application.

Effect of compliance or noncompliance

The court stated that no further action would be taken, no summons would issue, and no answer would be required until payment or a completed and signed IFP application was received. If the application were granted, the plaintiff could proceed without prepaying the fees. If Aziz failed to comply within the allowed time or failed to request an extension, the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling.

Ruling

The court directed payment of the filing fees or submission of an IFP application; it did not decide the merits of the action. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.