Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled July 17, 2025

Winnie v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Ricardo
Docket
1:25-cv-01177
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Winnie v. Bisignano, Judge Ricardo reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the matter for a new hearing and decision.

Who this affects

Julie Winnie and the Commissioner of Social Security; the Commissioner’s final decision was reversed, and the matter was sent back for further administrative action, including a new hearing and decision.

What happened

In Winnie v. Commissioner of Social Security, Julie Winnie challenged the Commissioner’s final decision. The opinion does not explain the underlying claim or why the decision was challenged.

The Commissioner asked the court to send the matter back for further administrative action, including a new hearing and a new decision. Winnie, through her attorney, agreed to the requested remand.

Judge Henry J. Ricardo reversed the Commissioner’s final decision and remanded the matter for further administrative action. The court also dismissed the matter in accordance with the cited Supreme Court decision in Melkonyan v. Sullivan.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Winnie v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:25-cv-01177
Judge
Ricardo
Date
July 17, 2025

Background

Julie Winnie was the plaintiff, and Frank Bisignano, identified as the Commissioner of Social Security, was the defendant. The opinion is a consent order under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), a provision that authorizes a federal court to send a Social Security case back to the agency for further proceedings. The opinion does not describe the underlying benefits claim, the administrative proceedings, or the alleged errors in the Commissioner’s decision.

Request for Remand

The Commissioner asked the court to remand the case for further administrative action. The requested action included offering Winnie a new hearing and issuing a new decision. Winnie, through her attorney, consented to the order and the requested remand.

Ruling

Judge Henry J. Ricardo ordered that the Commissioner’s final decision be reversed and that the matter be remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative action. The court also ordered that the matter be dismissed in accordance with Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.