Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 22, 2025

Doe v. Housing Solutions

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-03770
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Doe v. Housing Solutions: Judge Swain dismissed the action under a July 22 order not provided here and certified any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

John Doe’s action was dismissed. Housing Solutions and the other named defendants were parties to the judgment. The provided text does not state the effect of the dismissal on any particular claims.

What happened

In Doe v. Housing Solutions, the court dismissed John Doe’s action for the reasons stated in a separate July 22, 2025, order. That order is not included in the provided opinion.

The court also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment does not explain which claims or legal issues the July 22 order addressed.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the civil judgment. Because the referenced order is not provided, the basis for the dismissal cannot be summarized from this judgment alone.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Doe v. Housing Solutions · No. 1:25-cv-03770
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 22, 2025

Ruling

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action. It stated that the dismissal was based on the reasons given in a July 22, 2025, order, but that order is not included in the provided text.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment cited the rule that an appeal is taken in good faith when the appellant seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue.

What the Provided Text Does Not Show

The judgment does not identify the claims, explain the grounds for dismissal, or state whether the court reached the merits of any claim. Those details would require review of the separate July 22 order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.