Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 22, 2025

Yang v. Feilos Holding LLC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05987
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Yang v. Feilos Holding, Judge Swain ordered payment of the filing fees or submission of an application to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Miao Yang, whose civil action cannot proceed until the required fees are paid or a completed and signed application to proceed without prepayment of fees is received.

What happened

In Yang v. Feilos Holding LLC, the court ordered Miao Yang to pay the required $405 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without paying the fees upfront.

Yang had 30 days from the order to comply or request more time. Until then, the court would take no further action, and no summons or answer would be required. If Yang did not comply, the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Yang v. Feilos Holding LLC · No. 1:25-cv-05987
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 22, 2025

Background

Miao Yang submitted this civil action to the court by email. The court explained that a person starting a civil action must either pay the required fees or submit a signed application asking to proceed without paying those fees upfront. The required amount was $405, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee.

Order

The court ordered Yang, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $405 or complete, sign, and submit the attached application to proceed without prepayment of fees. The order described acceptable payment methods and directed Yang to include the docket number with any mailed payment.

The court stated that it would take no further action and would not issue a summons or require an answer until it received payment or a completed and signed application. If Yang complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If the court granted the application, Yang would be allowed to proceed without paying the fees upfront.

Effect of Noncompliance and Appeal

If Yang failed to comply within the deadline and did not request an extension, the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling. The court also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepayment of fees for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.