Mallgren v. United Nations
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-05764
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Mallgren v. United Nations: Judge Swain dismissed the action and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.
Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against the United Nations and other defendants identified in the caption; the provided judgment does not specify which claims or defendants were affected beyond stating that the action was dismissed.
What happened
In Mallgren v. United Nations, the court entered a civil judgment dismissing Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against the United Nations and other defendants.
The judgment gives no further explanation and says the dismissal was for the reasons stated in a separate July 23, 2025, order, which is not included here.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment does not state the scope or other consequences of that certification.
The detailed version
- Mallgren v. United Nations · No. 1:25-cv-05764
- Laura Swain
- July 23, 2025
Disposition
The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action. It stated that the dismissal was based on the reasons given in a separate order dated July 23, 2025. That order is not included in the provided text, so the judgment alone does not identify the claims, the defendants affected, or the court’s reasons for dismissal.
Appeal Certification
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment does not provide further explanation of that certification.
What the Provided Text Does Not Resolve
Because the referenced July 23 order is not provided, this summary cannot determine whether the dismissal rested on a particular procedural ground, the merits, or another basis. The court’s stated action in the provided judgment is dismissal of the action.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.