Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 23, 2025

Mallgren v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05951
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mallgren v. United States, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

Who this affects

The judgment affects Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against the United States and other defendants, including his ability to pursue an appeal without paying filing fees.

What happened

In Mallgren v. United States, the court entered a judgment dismissing Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against the United States and other defendants.

The judgment gives no reason for the dismissal; it refers to a July 22, 2025, order that is not included here. It therefore does not show which claims or legal issues were addressed.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. United States · No. 1:25-cv-05951
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 23, 2025

Disposition

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action “for the reasons stated” in a July 22, 2025, order. That order is not included in the provided opinion, so the basis for dismissal cannot be determined from this text.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status, meaning permission to pursue an appeal without paying the required filing fees, for purposes of an appeal.

Classification

This is a procedural order because the provided judgment dismisses the action without stating that the court decided the underlying legal claims. The missing July 22 order might contain additional reasoning or rulings not available in the provided text.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.