Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 23, 2025

Mallgren v. Does

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05989
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mallgren v. Does, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action was dismissed, and he was denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The defendants are identified only as John Does.

What happened

Mallgren v. Does is a civil action brought by Anthony Brian Mallgren against defendants identified as John Does. The provided judgment does not explain the claims or the reasons for dismissal; it refers to a separate July 23, 2025, order.

The judgment states that the action was dismissed. It does not identify the legal basis for that dismissal in the text provided.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Mallgren permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. Does · No. 1:25-cv-05989
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 23, 2025

Disposition

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action “for the reasons stated” in a separate July 23, 2025, order. That order is not included in the provided text, so the judgment does not reveal the claims, arguments, or legal grounds for dismissal.

Appeal-Filing Status

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. Based on that certification, the court denied permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962).

Result

The action was dismissed, and fee-free appeal status was denied. The provided text does not state whether the dismissal permits or bars refiling.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.