Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 23, 2025

Mallgren v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05990
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mallgren v. United States, Judge Swain dismissed the action, but the provided judgment does not state why.

Who this affects

Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against the United States and the other named defendants was dismissed.

What happened

In Mallgren v. United States, Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against the United States and other defendants was dismissed. The judgment gives no additional facts about the claims or the parties’ arguments.

The judgment says the dismissal was for the reasons stated in a July 23, 2025 order, but that order is not included in the provided text. Because of that, the basis for the dismissal cannot be determined here.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith under federal law. The provided text does not state any further appeal procedures.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. United States · No. 1:25-cv-05990
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 23, 2025

What the Court Decided

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action brought by Anthony Brian Mallgren against the United States and other defendants. The judgment states that the dismissal was based on reasons given in a separate July 23, 2025 order, but that order is not part of the provided opinion text.

What Is Unclear

The provided judgment does not identify Mallgren’s claims, the defendants’ arguments, or the legal basis for dismissal. It therefore does not show whether the court decided the merits of any claim or dismissed the action on a threshold or procedural ground.

Appeal Certification

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962).

Disposition

The action was dismissed. The judgment does not say that the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.