Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 29, 2025

Black v. New York City Housing Authority

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:25-cv-05126
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureEmploymentADA / DisabilityPro Se
In one sentence

In Black v. New York City Housing Authority, Judge Abrams ordered Marshals service for Black’s employment-discrimination lawsuit.

Who this affects

Yasmine N. Black and the New York City Housing Authority; the order directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the Housing Authority.

What happened

Black v. New York City Housing Authority involves Yasmine N. Black’s claims that her employer discriminated against her because of disability and age under several federal, state, and city laws.

Black is representing herself and was previously allowed to proceed without paying court fees upfront. Because of that status, the court directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the Housing Authority with the lawsuit.

Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered the Clerk to issue the summons, complete the service paperwork, and send the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. Black must seek more time if service is not completed within 90 days after the summons is issued and must notify the court if her address changes.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Black v. New York City Housing Authority · No. 1:25-cv-05126
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
July 29, 2025

Background

Yasmine N. Black, who is proceeding without a lawyer, sued the New York City Housing Authority under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. She alleges that her employer discriminated against her because of her disability and age.

The court had previously granted Black permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. This status is commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis, or IFP. In an IFP case, federal law and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require the court to direct the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant when service is needed.

Order

The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued because Black could not have served the defendant before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summons issued. The court stated that Black should request an extension if the complaint is not served within that period.

The Clerk of Court was instructed to issue a summons for the New York City Housing Authority, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with the defendant’s address, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail an information package to Black. Black must notify the court in writing if her address changes; the court stated that it may dismiss the action if she fails to do so. The order does not decide whether Black’s discrimination claims have merit. Judge Ronnie Abrams entered the order on July 29, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.