Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 30, 2025

Scales v. Paramount video

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-02630
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Scales v. Paramount Video, Chief Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied status allowing an appeal without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

William Scales and Vision Streams, whose action was dismissed; an appeal from the judgment would not receive in forma pauperis status under this judgment.

What happened

Scales v. Paramount Video was brought by William Scales and Vision Streams against Paramount Video. The provided judgment does not describe the claims or the parties’ arguments.

The court dismissed the action for the reasons stated in a July 25, 2025 order, which is not included here. It also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on July 30, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Scales v. Paramount video · No. 1:25-cv-02630
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 30, 2025

Background

William Scales and Vision Streams were the plaintiffs, and Paramount Video was the defendant. The provided civil judgment does not state what claims were asserted, what facts were alleged, or what arguments the parties made. It refers to a July 25, 2025 order for the reasons supporting dismissal, but that order is not included in the provided text.

Rulings

The court dismissed the action. The judgment does not specify the legal basis for that dismissal or state whether the court reached the merits of the claims.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status—that is, permission to pursue an appeal without prepaying court fees—for purposes of an appeal.

Effect

The action was dismissed, and the judgment denies fee-free appeal status. The provided text does not identify any other claims, remedies, or conditions of dismissal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.