Morris v. Warden
- Sallie Kim
- 3:25-cv-05395
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 3
In Morris v. Arias, Judge Orrick dismissed Morris’s second federal habeas petition because the appeals court had not authorized it.
Taray Taqwain Morris’s federal habeas petition was dismissed. Roberto A. Arias was entered as the sole respondent, and judgment was entered in his favor.
What happened
In Morris v. Arias, Taray Taqwain Morris challenged the same 2004 California criminal judgment that he had challenged in an earlier federal petition. The earlier petition was denied on the merits, and the appeals court and Supreme Court declined further review.
The court explained that a person must obtain authorization from the federal appeals court before filing a second or successive petition challenging the same state judgment. Because Morris had not shown that he received that authorization, the district court lacked authority to consider the petition.
Judge William H. Orrick dismissed the petition as second or successive, declined to issue a certificate of appealability, entered judgment for Roberto A. Arias, and ordered the file closed.
The detailed version
- Morris v. Warden · No. 3:25-cv-05395
- Sallie Kim
- Aug. 5, 2025
Background
Taray Taqwain Morris filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a 2004 California state criminal judgment from the Monterey County Superior Court. The judgment followed a plea agreement under which Morris pleaded guilty to felony possession of a deadly weapon by an inmate and felony assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury. He also admitted the charged enhancements and prior prison terms. The court states that he received a sentence of 25 years to life under California’s Three Strikes Law, consecutive to the terms he was already serving.
The court explained that Morris had previously filed a federal habeas petition challenging the same state judgment in a prior related proceeding, No. 06-cv-07409. That petition was denied on the merits. The Ninth Circuit affirmed, denied rehearing en banc, and the Supreme Court denied review and rehearing.
Reason for dismissal
A second or successive federal habeas petition requires authorization from the federal court of appeals before the district court may consider it. The court stated that, without that authorization, the district court lacks jurisdiction over the petition. Morris had not shown that the Ninth Circuit authorized his pending petition.
Disposition
The court dismissed the petition as second or successive and unauthorized by the Court of Appeals. It stated that a certificate of appealability would not issue, ordered Roberto A. Arias entered as the sole respondent, entered judgment in favor of Arias, and directed the Clerk to close the file.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.