Exhibition Employees Local 829 I.A.T.S.E. Pension Fund v. National Convention…
Exhibition Employees Local 829 I.A.T.S.E. Pension Fund v. National Convention Services, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-07833
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 8
Exhibition Employees Pension Fund v. National Convention Services, LLC: Judge Vyskocil granted default judgment and awarded $33,499.78 for unpaid benefit contributions, interest, damages, and fees.
The Exhibition Employees Local 829 I.A.T.S.E. Pension Fund and Judith P. Broach obtained a $33,499.78 judgment against National Convention Services, LLC, which did not defend the case.
What happened
In Exhibition Employees Local 829 I.A.T.S.E. Pension Fund v. National Convention Services, LLC, the Fund and Judith P. Broach alleged that National Convention Services failed to make required benefit contributions under a collective bargaining agreement. The company was served but did not respond to the lawsuit or appear at the default-judgment hearing.
The court found that the allegations and supporting documents established violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and the Labor Management Relations Act. It awarded $17,528.50 in unpaid contributions, $5,538.89 in interest, $5,538.89 in liquidated damages, and $4,893.50 in attorneys’ fees and costs.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil granted the motion for default judgment and entered judgment for the plaintiffs in the total amount of $33,499.78. The court directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the case.
The detailed version
- Exhibition Employees Local 829 I.A.T.S.E. Pension Fund v. National Convention… · No. 1:24-cv-07833
- Vyskocil
- Aug. 7, 2025
Background
The Exhibition Employees Local 829 I.A.T.S.E. Pension Fund and Judith P. Broach, acting as the Fund’s independent fiduciary, sued National Convention Services, LLC. The complaint alleged that National Convention Services was bound by a collective bargaining agreement with Exhibition Employees Union, Local No. 829. Under that agreement, the company allegedly had to make hourly contributions to benefit funds for covered employees but failed to make required contributions.
The company was served on December 16,
- The Clerk entered a certificate of default on January 17,
- The plaintiffs then moved for default judgment. After the court ordered a hearing and directed the plaintiffs to serve the supporting papers on the company, the court held the hearing on July 8,
- Counsel for the plaintiffs attended, but National Convention Services did not respond or appear.
Default judgment standard
A default judgment is a judgment entered against a party that fails to defend. The court first considered whether the company’s failure to respond was willful, whether it had a potentially valid defense, and whether denying judgment would prejudice the plaintiffs. The court found that all three considerations favored entering default judgment. It also found that it had federal-question jurisdiction because the claims arose under federal statutes and personal jurisdiction because the company was organized under New York law, had its principal place of business in New York, and was properly served.
Liability
The plaintiffs asserted claims under Section 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA). The court found that the plaintiffs had adequately established the elements of the ERISA claim: National Convention Services was an employer, it was bound by a collective bargaining agreement requiring contributions to employee benefit plans, and it failed to make those contributions. The court relied on the complaint, the collective bargaining agreement, and trust agreements requiring employer contributions.
The court also found that the plaintiffs had adequately established liability under the LMRA. Section 301 provides a claim for violating a contract between an employer and a labor organization, and the court found that the allegations sufficiently showed that National Convention Services breached the collective bargaining agreement by failing to make required contributions. The plaintiffs did not seek damages on the LMRA claim.
Damages and disposition
The court independently reviewed sworn declarations and documentary evidence because damages are not automatically accepted as true when a defendant defaults. It entered judgment for $33,499.78, consisting of $17,528.50 in unpaid contributions, $5,538.89 in interest through February 10, 2025, $5,538.89 in liquidated damages, and $4,893.50 in reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. The opinion’s earlier factual summary describes the alleged unpaid contributions as covering April 2019 through March 2020, while the damages award describes the contribution period as January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020; the opinion does not explain this difference. The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment, directed entry of judgment, and ordered the case closed.
Read the full 8-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.