Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 8, 2025

Goh v. Daley

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04747
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Goh v. Daley, Judge Swain dismissed Eric Goh’s complaint without prejudice after he neither filed the required fee-waiver application nor paid filing fees.

Who this affects

Eric Goh, whose complaint was dismissed without prejudice, and Henry Daley, the named defendant.

What happened

In Goh v. Daley, the court had ordered Eric Goh to submit an amended application to proceed without paying filing fees or pay the $405 filing fee within 30 days. The order warned that failing to do so would lead to dismissal.

Goh did neither. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Goh permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Goh v. Daley · No. 1:25-cv-04747
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 8, 2025

Background

On June 13, 2025, the court ordered Plaintiff Eric Goh to submit an amended application to proceed without paying filing fees, known as an application for in forma pauperis status, or to pay the $405 required filing fee. The order stated that failure to comply within 30 days would result in dismissal of the complaint.

Rulings

The court found that Goh had not submitted the amended application or paid the filing fee. It therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

Appeal-Fee Ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.