Young v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:25-cv-06041
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Young v. Experian, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after the parties reported a resolution, allowing restoration by September 12, 2025, under stated conditions.
Charlene Young and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; the action was discontinued based on the parties’ reported resolution, subject to the stated restoration deadline and conditions.
What happened
Young v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ended after the parties jointly told the court that they had reached a resolution.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. The case could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and filed an application by September 12, 2025.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the dismissal and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the pending motion and close the case. If no timely restoration request was filed, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Young v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-06041
- Vyskocil
- Aug. 13, 2025
Background
Charlene Young sued Experian Information Solutions, Inc. The opinion does not describe the claims. The parties jointly notified the court that they had reached a resolution.
Court’s Action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by September 12, 2025.
The court stated that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the motion pending at docket entry 5 and close the case.
Disposition
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal based on the parties’ reported resolution. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.