Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 12, 2025

Taylor v. City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-03448
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Taylor v. City of New York, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint after Taylor failed to file the required amended complaint.

Who this affects

Sheba Taylor’s complaint was dismissed, and her fee-free status for an appeal was denied. The court directed entry of a civil judgment.

What happened

Taylor v. City of New York involved Sheba Taylor’s complaint against the City of New York and other defendants. The opinion does not describe the claims.

On May 8, 2025, the court ordered Taylor to file an amended complaint within 30 days and warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal. Taylor did not file an amended complaint.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint under the federal statute governing screening of complaints filed without paying court fees. She also denied Taylor fee-free status for an appeal, certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and directed the clerk to enter a civil judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Taylor v. City of New York · No. 1:25-cv-03448
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 12, 2025

Background

The opinion concerns a complaint filed by Sheba Taylor against the City of New York and other defendants. The court had allowed Taylor to proceed without paying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

Prior Order and Noncompliance

On May 8, 2025, the court directed Taylor to file an amended complaint within 30 days. That order stated that failing to comply would result in dismissal. Taylor did not file an amended complaint.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The opinion does not state the claims in the complaint or address their merits. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Taylor the ability to proceed without paying fees for an appeal. The court directed the clerk to enter a civil judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.