Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 14, 2025

Gulley v. Doe

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04539
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Gulley v. Doe, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied appeal-related in forma pauperis status.

Who this affects

The judgment dismissed Keon Gulley’s action against Doe and denied appeal-related permission to proceed without paying filing fees.

What happened

In Gulley v. Doe, the court entered a civil judgment dismissing Keon Gulley’s action against Doe. The judgment gives no reason for the dismissal itself, instead referring to an August 12, 2025 order.

The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Gulley permission to proceed without paying filing fees for an appeal.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on August 14, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gulley v. Doe · No. 1:25-cv-04539
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 14, 2025

Action and ruling

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing Keon Gulley’s action against Doe. The judgment states that the dismissal is based on reasons given in an August 12, 2025 order, but that order is not included in the provided text. The available opinion therefore does not explain the legal basis for dismissal or whether the court reached the underlying dispute.

Appeal-related filing status

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for purposes of an appeal. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States for the meaning of good faith in this context.

Disposition

The action was dismissed. Appeal-related permission to proceed without paying filing fees was denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.