Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 14, 2025

Robinson v. Doe

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05588
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Robinson v. Doe, Judge Swain dismissed the action and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

The judgment dismissed Israel Robinson’s action against Doe and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

What happened

Israel Robinson brought this action against Doe, but the judgment does not describe the underlying claims or events. It refers to an August 12, 2025, order for the reasons supporting dismissal.

The court dismissed the action. It also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

In Israel Robinson v. Doe, Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on August 14, 2025. The opinion provided does not include the August 12 order, so it does not explain why the action was dismissed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Robinson v. Doe · No. 1:25-cv-05588
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 14, 2025

Ruling

The court entered a civil judgment stating: “For the reasons stated in the August 12, 2025, order, this action is dismissed.” The provided judgment does not include the August 12 order or otherwise explain the basis for dismissal.

Appeal Certification

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States for the standard that an appellant demonstrates good faith by seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue.

Disposition

The action was dismissed. The supplied opinion does not state whether the dismissal was based on the merits, a procedural ground, or another reason.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.