Knowmad Services, Inc. v. Nomad Marketing Consulting, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-07665
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Knowmad Services v. Nomad Marketing, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle and denied the pending dismissal motion as moot.
Knowmad Services, Inc. and Nomad Marketing Consulting, LLC.
What happened
In Knowmad Services, Inc. v. Nomad Marketing Consulting, LLC, the court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and applied by September 15, 2025. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also denied the pending motion to dismiss as moot and adjourned all other deadlines without setting a new date.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order on August 15, 2025, and directed the clerk to terminate the motion and close the case.
The detailed version
- Knowmad Services, Inc. v. Nomad Marketing Consulting, LLC · No. 1:24-cv-07665
- Vyskocil
- Aug. 15, 2025
Background
The court stated that the magistrate judge had informed it that the parties reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement's terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court's calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and made an application to restore the action by September 15, 2025. If no application was made by that date, the court stated that the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The court also denied the motion to dismiss at docket entry 33 as moot, meaning the settlement-related dismissal made it unnecessary to decide that motion. All other dates and deadlines were adjourned without a new date. The clerk was requested to terminate docket entry 33 and close the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.