Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 20, 2025

Jonassen v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05257
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Jonassen v. United States, Judge Swain required payment or an IFP application and prisoner authorization, or the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

Who this affects

Martin Jonassen, the incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization; otherwise, his action will be dismissed without prejudice.

What happened

In Jonassen v. United States, Martin Jonassen, who is incarcerated, filed the action without paying the required fees or submitting the documents needed to ask to proceed without paying fees upfront. Although he called the case a habeas petition, the court noted that his claims concern alleged denial of Passover food and seek damages under federal religious-rights laws.

The court gave Jonassen 30 days from August 20, 2025, to either pay $405 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. The authorization would allow installment payments of the $350 filing fee from his prison account. No answer from the defendants was required at that time.

Judge Swain ordered that the case will be processed if Jonassen complies, but the action will be dismissed without prejudice if he does not comply within the deadline. The court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jonassen v. United States · No. 1:25-cv-05257
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 20, 2025

Background

Martin Jonassen filed the action without a filing fee, a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees, or a prisoner authorization. The opinion states that Jonassen is incarcerated at FCI Otisville and is representing himself. Although he styles the action as a habeas petition, the court explains that he asserts claims under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act against Chaplain Davis and Assistant Chaplain White, seeking damages for the alleged denial of Passover food.

Fees and required filings

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $405—the $350 filing fee and $55 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. To make that request, the prisoner must submit a signed application and a prisoner authorization. If permission is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires installment payments of the $350 filing fee from the prisoner’s account, and the authorization permits the institution to make those deductions and send the court account statements.

Order

The court directed Jonassen, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $405 in fees or submit the application and prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 25-CV-5257 (LTS). No answer was required from the defendants at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Jonassen complied and that the action would be dismissed without prejudice if he failed to comply within the allowed time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The opinion additionally cautioned that certain dismissals of prisoner actions can count as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.