Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 20, 2025

Lonza Greenwood LLC v. Natals, Inc.

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:25-cv-06319
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePreliminary Injunction
In one sentence

In Lonza Greenwood v. Natals, Judge Engelmayer granted Natals permission to file redacted exhibits publicly and unredacted versions under seal.

Who this affects

Natals, Inc. received authorization to file redacted versions of Exhibits A, B, D, and F publicly and unredacted versions under seal; the order addressed filing access, not the merits of the dispute.

What happened

In Lonza Greenwood LLC v. Natals, Inc., Natals asked the court to seal or redact exhibits and related passages filed in opposition to Lonza’s request for a preliminary injunction. The requested materials included business documents and information about products, pricing, ingredients, testing, and development plans.

Natals argued that disclosure could reveal confidential commercial information and harm its competitive position. It also sought to seal Exhibit D, which belonged to Lonza and which Lonza claimed contained trade secrets.

The court granted Natals permission to file redacted versions of Exhibits A, B, D, and F publicly and unredacted versions under seal. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer’s order did not decide the underlying preliminary-injunction dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lonza Greenwood LLC v. Natals, Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-06319
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Aug. 20, 2025

Background

Lonza filed a complaint against Natals, Inc., doing business as Ritual, and sought a preliminary injunction. Natals submitted an opposition and supporting materials. It then asked for permission to file certain documents under seal or in redacted form.

The request concerned Exhibits A, B, D, and F to a declaration supporting Natals’s opposition, as well as portions of the opposition and a declaration that quoted from Exhibit D. According to the filing, Exhibit A was a sales agreement; Exhibit B concerned clinical trials, ingredients, and testing results; Exhibit F contained preliminary plans for an unannounced product; and Exhibit D was a PowerPoint deck belonging to Lonza that Lonza claimed contained trade secrets.

Sealing request

Natals argued that the materials contained confidential pricing information, product specifications, ingredients, manufacturing plans, negotiation strategy, testing information, and product-development plans. It asserted that public disclosure could harm its competitive position. The filing discussed the common-law presumption of public access to judicial documents and the possible protection of proprietary business information and trade secrets.

Ruling

The court granted the request stated in the order. It authorized Natals to file redacted versions of Exhibits A, B, D, and F on the public record and to file unredacted versions under seal. The order did not state a separate disposition for the requested redactions to portions of the opposition or declaration. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer did not rule on the merits of Lonza’s preliminary-injunction request in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.