Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 26, 2025

Walter Auto Loan Trust v. Posh Automotive LLC

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:24-cv-05170
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
BankruptcyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Walter Auto Loan Trust v. Posh Automotive, Judge Woods stayed the case after a bankruptcy notice concerning Posh Automotive LLC and adjourned trial-related dates.

Who this affects

Walter Auto Loan Trust, Posh Automotive LLC, and the scheduled proceedings in their case are affected by the automatic stay.

What happened

Walter Auto Loan Trust v. Posh Automotive LLC concerns a bankruptcy notice involving defendant Posh Automotive LLC.

The court said the bankruptcy automatically paused this case. It directed the plaintiffs to submit a status letter by the earlier of an event affecting the bankruptcy pause or April 15, 2026.

Judge Woods also adjourned the final pretrial conference, pretrial-submission deadlines, and trial, and directed the Clerk of Court to record the pause on the docket.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Walter Auto Loan Trust v. Posh Automotive LLC · No. 1:24-cv-05170
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Aug. 26, 2025

Background

The court received a suggestion of bankruptcy concerning defendant Posh Automotive LLC.

Court’s action

The court held that the case was automatically stayed under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). An automatic stay is a legal pause that generally stops proceedings against a bankruptcy debtor. The court directed the plaintiffs to submit a status letter on the earlier of any event that they contend affects the automatic stay or April 15, 2026.

The court adjourned the final pretrial conference scheduled for October 28, 2025, the deadlines for all pretrial submissions, and the trial scheduled to begin on December 2, 2025. The order states that these matters were adjourned “sive de.” The Clerk of Court was directed to note the stay on the docket.

Result

The case was stayed, and the listed pretrial and trial dates were adjourned. The order did not decide the underlying dispute between the parties.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.