Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 26, 2025

Partridge v. Black Rock LLC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00696
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Partridge v. Black Rock LLC, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Nicholas Partridge, whose action was dismissed, and any appeal from the judgment, for which the court denied fee-free status.

What happened

In Partridge v. Black Rock LLC, Nicholas Partridge sued Black Rock LLC and three individuals identified as its officers. The judgment does not describe the claims or the events underlying the lawsuit.

The court said the action was dismissed for the reasons stated in an August 25, 2025, order. That earlier order is not included in the provided opinion, so the basis for dismissal cannot be determined here.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Partridge fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The judgment was dated August 26, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Partridge v. Black Rock LLC · No. 1:25-cv-00696
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 26, 2025

Disposition

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action “for the reasons stated” in its August 25, 2025, order. The provided opinion does not include that earlier order, and therefore does not state the claims, the parties’ arguments, or the court’s basis for dismissal.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status—permission to proceed without paying the ordinary court costs—for purposes of an appeal. The opinion cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962).

Uncertainty

Because the August 25 order is not provided, this summary cannot determine whether the dismissal reached the merits or rested on a procedural ground. The classification below treats the judgment as a procedural order because the supplied text contains no merits analysis.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.