Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 26, 2025

In re: Javier Pereira

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04518
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In re: Javier Pereira, Judge Swain kept the action closed after Pereira missed the deadline to pay fees or submit required forms.

Who this affects

Javier Pereira, who appeared without a lawyer and whose civil action remains closed after his late submission of the required fee-waiver application and prisoner authorization.

What happened

In In re: Javier Pereira, the court had ordered Javier Pereira to pay $405 in filing fees or submit an application to proceed without paying the fees and a prisoner authorization. Pereira did not provide the required information within the 30-day deadline, so the court dismissed the action without prejudice.

The court later received Pereira’s fee-waiver application and prisoner authorization by mail, but the documents arrived after the deadline. The documents were not postmarked, and the court could not determine when Pereira submitted them to the facility’s mail system.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ruled that the action remains closed. Pereira may pursue the claims by filing a new complaint and either paying the $405 fee or submitting new, completed and signed forms. The court also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal after certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In re: Javier Pereira · No. 1:25-cv-04518
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 26, 2025

Background

Javier Pereira appeared without a lawyer and was being held at the West Facility on Rikers Island. In an earlier order, the court gave him 30 days to either pay the $405 required filing fee for the civil action or submit an application to proceed without paying the fee, commonly called an application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a prisoner authorization. The court warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Pereira did not provide the required information within the 30-day period. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice. On August 21, 2025—the date the dismissal order and judgment were entered—the court received Pereira’s application and prisoner authorization by mail, and entered them on August 22. The envelope was not postmarked, and Pereira did not state when he submitted the documents to the facility’s mail system. The court also could not determine the meaning of the dates Pereira wrote on the documents, but concluded that he submitted them after the deadline.

Ruling

The court stated that the action remains closed. If Pereira wishes to pursue the claims from this action, he must file another complaint starting a new civil action. He must also either pay the $405 filing fee or submit another completed and signed fee-waiver application and another completed and signed prisoner authorization.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.