Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 25, 2025

Blanco v. The National Science Foundation

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05436
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Blanco v. The National Science Foundation, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Blanco neither paid the fees nor filed an amended fee-waiver application.

Who this affects

The dismissal affects Carlita Blanco's complaint against The National Science Foundation, HUD-COC, and Unsolicited Research Partnerships. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice.

What happened

In Blanco v. The National Science Foundation, the court had ordered Blanco to file an amended application to proceed without paying filing fees or pay the required $405 filing fee within 30 days.

Blanco did neither. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice.

Judge Swain also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal after certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Blanco v. The National Science Foundation · No. 1:25-cv-05436
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 25, 2025

Background

On July 9, 2025, the court directed Plaintiff Carlita Blanco to submit an amended application to proceed without paying filing fees, or to pay the $405 required to file a civil action. The court warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

Ruling

Blanco did not file an amended application or pay the filing fees. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal. The court also directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.