Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 25, 2025

Blanco v. Blige

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05437
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Blanco v. Blige, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Blanco neither paid filing fees nor submitted the required application.

Who this affects

Carlita Blanco's case was dismissed without prejudice because she did not submit the required amended fee-waiver application or pay the $405 filing fee; permission to appeal without paying fees was also denied.

What happened

In Blanco v. Blige, the court had ordered Plaintiff Carlita Blanco to submit an amended application to proceed without paying filing fees or to pay the $405 filing fee within 30 days.

Blanco did neither. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling, and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Blanco v. Blige · No. 1:25-cv-05437
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 25, 2025

Background

By an order dated July 9, 2025, the court directed Plaintiff Carlita Blanco to do one of two things within 30 days: submit an amended application to proceed without paying filing fees, or pay the $405 required fee for filing a civil action. The court warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

Blanco did not submit an amended application or pay the fee. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims against Defendant Mary J. Blige 1983.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. It also directed the clerk to enter judgment. In addition, the court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

Effect

The opinion does not bar Blanco from refiling the complaint because the dismissal was without prejudice. It does not address the merits of the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.