Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 1, 2025

Herrera v. County of San Benito

Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Docket
5:24-cv-01133
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rosario Herrera v. County of San Benito, Judge Cousins conditionally dismissed the settled case with prejudice, closed it administratively, and retained jurisdiction for 60 days.

Who this affects

Rosario Herrera and County of San Benito; the action and all asserted claims were dismissed with prejudice, the case was administratively closed, and scheduled dates were vacated.

What happened

Rosario Herrera v. County of San Benito ended after the court was notified that the parties had settled the action and that no issue remained for the court to decide.

The court dismissed the action and all claims with prejudice, directed the Clerk to administratively close the case, vacated all scheduled dates, and allowed either party to seek reopening within 60 days.

Judge Cousins retained jurisdiction for 60 days. The order does not describe the settlement’s terms or the claims’ underlying facts.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Herrera v. County of San Benito · No. 5:24-cv-01133
Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Date
Oct. 1, 2025

Background

The court stated that it had been notified of a settlement and that no issue remained for the court’s determination. The order does not provide the settlement terms or describe the underlying claims.

Ruling

The court entered a conditional dismissal order. It dismissed the action and all claims asserted in it with prejudice. It directed the Clerk of Court to administratively close the case, vacated all scheduled dates, and allowed any party to move to reopen the case if the motion was filed within 60 days.

The court retained jurisdiction over the case for 60 days. The order does not decide the merits of the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.