Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 28, 2025

Johnson v. Hamilton County Sheriffs Office

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-01620
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Robert W. Johnson v. Hamilton County Sheriffs Office, Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because Johnson lacked required filing permission.

Who this affects

Robert W. Johnson’s action was dismissed without prejudice; the opinion does not reach the claims against the Hamilton County Sheriffs Office.

What happened

Robert W. Johnson filed this action without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. A prior order barred him from filing new civil actions in this court under that status unless he first obtained permission.

The court dismissed the action without prejudice because Johnson had not sought the required permission before filing. The opinion does not address the claims against the Hamilton County Sheriffs Office.

Judge Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Johnson permission to proceed without paying the appeal fee. The clerk was directed to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Johnson v. Hamilton County Sheriffs Office · No. 1:25-cv-01620
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 28, 2025

Background

Robert W. Johnson filed a new civil action without a lawyer and requested permission to proceed without paying the filing fee. The court had previously ordered that Johnson could not file any new civil action in this court under that status unless he first obtained permission from the court. The opinion identifies that earlier related proceeding as ECF 1:19-CV-7337, 8, and states that an appeal from the earlier order was dismissed.

Reason for Dismissal

The court found that Johnson had not asked for the required permission before filing this action. It therefore dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, based on Johnson’s failure to comply with the earlier court order. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims.

Other Rulings

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying the fee for an appeal. The court also directed the clerk to enter judgment. The order was signed by Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.